Potrait Empirical Performance Finance Banking Sharia in Indonesia: Systematic Literature Reviews
Abstrak
The aim of this study was to analyze the financial performance of Islamic banking using data collected from journals published between 2017 and 2021, applying a systematic literature review method. The findings from the review reveal the following: 1) A total of 31 articles were reviewed, with 11 articles published in 2017, 6 in 2018, 7 in 2019, 5 in 2020, and 2 in 2021; 2) Researchers predominantly employed a descriptive quantitative method using descriptive statistical approaches, with no studies utilizing qualitative or mixed-method approaches; 3) Financial ratios were the primary tools used for performance measurement; 4) The financial performance of Islamic banking was found to be volatile but generally showed an improving trend; 5) To enhance performance, Islamic banks are advised to improve their financial ratios; and 6) The study's limitations include the sample size, number of variables and indicators, observation period, and analytical techniques used
Referensi
Amalia, AN (2018). Comparative Analysis of Financial Stability Levels of Islamic and Conventional Banking in Indonesia. Syi'ar Iqtishadi: Journal of Islamic Economics, Finance and Banking, 2(1), 1–24.
AS, F. (2010). The Relationship between Service Quality Dimensions, Value and Customer Satisfaction of Bank Jatim in Madura Island. Pamator Journal, 3(2), 136–148.
Asraf, Yurasti, & Suwarni. (2019). Comparative Analysis of Financial Performance of Bank Syariah Mandiri with Conventional Bank Mandiri. MBIA Journal, 18(3), 121–136.
Budiartini, NKS, Agung, AAP, & Gama, AWS (2017). Analysis of Performance Differences Between Islamic Commercial Banks and Conventional Commercial Banks in Indonesia. MANAGEMENT FORUM, 15(2), 43–55.
Dandung, ME, Amtiran, PY, & Ratu, M. (2020). Comparative Analysis of Financial Performance of Conventional Banking and Islamic Banking. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT (SME's), 11(1), 65–82
Dwilita, H., & Tambunan, S. (2019). Comparison of Indonesian Sharia Banking Performance Studies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the Period 2008-2017. Journal of Business & Public Accounting, 10(1), 145–162.
economy.okezone.com. (2021). ojk-reveals-the-weaknesses-of-sharia-banks-so-they-lose-with-conventional-banking). https://economy.okezone.com/read/2021/10/15/ 320/2486629/ojk-reveals-the-weaknesses-of-sharia-banks -so-they-lose-with-conventional-banking
gramedia.com. (2021). best-seller/neobank. https://www.gramedia.com/best-seller/neobank
Ilmi, FT, & Wahyuati, A. (2019). Comparative Analysis of Financial Performance in Conventional Banks and Islamic Banks on the IDX. Journal of Management Science and Research, 8(3), 1–17.
infobanknews.com. (2021). opportunities-and-challenges-of-Islamic-banking-in-2021. https://infobanknews.com/opportunities-and-challenges-of-Islamic-banking-in-2021/
Iqbal, M. (2021). Current development of Islamic banking. https://sef.feb.ugm.ac.id/perkembanganperbankan-syariah-saat-ini/
Komalasari, I., & Wirman. (2021). Comparative Analysis of Financial Performance of Conventional Banks with Islamic Banks for the Period 2015-2019. Journal of Business Accounting, 14(2), 114– 125.
Komardi, D., & Silalahi, ER (2017). Comparative Analysis Of Financial Performance Of Syariah Banking And Conventional Banking. Kurs, 2(2), 175–183.
Kurniasih, ET, & Suryani, AI (2017). Comparative Analysis of Financial Performance of Islamic Banks with Conventional Banks (Case Study of PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri with PT. Bank Tabungan Negara Tbk. Period 2010-2015. DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL, 5(1), 99–109.
Latifah, L., & Ritonga, I. (2020). Systematic Literature Review (SLR): Human Resource Competence for the Development of Islamic Banking in Indonesia. Al Maal: Journal of Islamic Economics and Banking, 2(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.31000/almaal.v2i1.2763
Maharani, Y., Hafidhudin, D., & Tanjung, H. (2018). Comparative Analysis of Financial Performance of Islamic Banks and Conventional Banks Based on Accrual Basis and Cash Basis Models. Kasaba: Journal Of Islamic Economy, 11(1), 25– 41.
Mandasari, J. (2021). Comparative Analysis of Financial Performance of Conventional Banks and Islamic Banks in Indonesia 2016-2019. JAFA: Journal of Accounting, Finance and Auditing, 3(1), 17–24.
Mukhtar, A., & Rinaldi, S. (2019). Comparative Analysis of Financial Performance of Conventional Banks and Islamic Banks in Indonesia. PAY: Journal of Finance and Banking, 1(2), 58– 66.
Munawir, S. (2014). Financial Statement Analysis (15th ed.). Liberty.
Nasution, MS, & Kamal, H. (2021). Comparative Analysis of Islamic and Conventional Banking Performance Pre and Post Covid-19. ATTASYRI' Scientific Journal of Muamalah Study Program, 13(1), 29–38.
Novianti, M. (2019). Analysis of Differences in Financial Performance of Islamic Banks and Conventional Banks Using the CAMEL Ratio. Fairness Journal Volume, 9(2), 127–136.
Paramitha, DA, & Astuti, P. (2018). Comparative Analysis of Financial Performance in Islamic Banks and Conventional Banks. Journal Of Accounting & Economics, 3(2), 38–50.
Open Access
IDEA (International Development of Economics and Administration Journal) is a national peer reviewed and open access journal that publishes significant and important research from all area of Development of Economics and Administration.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content that making research publish in this journal freely available to the public that supports a greater exchange of knowledge.
Copyright
Submission of a manuscript implies that the submitted work has not been published before (except as part of a thesis or report, or abstract); that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that its publication has been approved by all co-authors. If and when the manuscript is accepted for publication, the author(s) still hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions. Authors or others are allowed to multiply article as long as not for commercial purposes. For the new invention, authors are suggested to manage its patent before published. The license type is CC-BY-SA 4.0.
Disclaimer
No responsibility is assumed by publisher and co-publishers, nor by the editors for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a result of any actual or alleged libelous statements, infringement of intellectual property or privacy rights, or products liability, whether resulting from negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any ideas, instructions, procedures, products or methods contained in the material therein.
